Comparisons
Both are good. They are aimed at genuinely different users, and the comparison is clearer than most.
A sophisticated interface to Spotlight's index. Multi-criteria queries, saved templates, refinement of an existing result set, side-by-side previews, duplicate detection, and extensive control over how results are grouped.
If your work involves *research* — finding every document that mentions a topic, then narrowing by date, author and type — it is excellent and worth its ~$34.
It reads Spotlight's index. Therefore:
~/Library results are largely unavailableThat is not a criticism of the app; it is the consequence of building on the system index, which is also what gives it content search for free.
A filename index with no exclusions, searched by scanning. No content search whatsoever. The design target is latency: results between keystrokes, six million files, under 2 ms per refinement.
| You want | Pick |
|---|---|
| Every document mentioning "shareholder agreement" | HoudahSpot |
| Complex saved searches with many criteria | HoudahSpot |
The file called agreement-final-v3.pdf, now | Everywhere |
Files in ~/Library or inside a Photos library | Everywhere |
| Something on a drive currently in a drawer | Everywhere |
They do not overlap much, which is why plenty of people own both. HoudahSpot for investigation, a filename index for retrieval.
It surfaces things Spotlight's interface hides and queries the index far more precisely, but it cannot show what was never indexed.
If you need content search and multi-criteria research, yes — that is a different job.
Everywhere keeps track of every file on your Mac — including the folders Spotlight hides and drives you have unplugged. Free for a day, then $19 once.
Download for Mac